homicide 222

where the defence of self defence is made out then the act done in self defence is not unlawful, the homicide is not culpable and the accused must be acquitted : r. v. baker (1988), 45 c.c.c. (3d) 368 (b.c.c.a.)
there is also case law that states in the matter of self defence ; the threat does not have to be imminent but can be implied, and that in self defence i have the right to use as much force as necessary up to, and including murder, to prevent an attack ; I'm looking for that case law ;
Mr president i have an enemy combatant, as you state in custody for murder of an American soldier, by throwing a hand grenade out from his place of hiding if my memory is correct ; i request with these facts before you, that this boy be set free and returned to his home ; Mr president in my opinion the constitution of the united states does not apply in Afghanistan or in Iraq ; your judicial powers are not that wide spread in a matter of war, or for that matter in peace either ; you are an invading army, and that there can be no less stated than that ; i believe you are in violation of international law under war measures acts to try persons under your authority of judicial powers to acts of murder in a combat scenario ; you can not change the fact to cover your actions as to remove the word invading force to one were we are here to help to establish a foot hold under fear to set a stage towards a ground invasion into Iran ; i know what your trying and what your up to ; yes the production of plutonium is a concern ; but your not going to use that as a prelude to cause an invasion on Iran and i will fight you with and to my last breath ; your intentions are deceit ; as but your intentions of deceit to go into Iraq were ; Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction then or now ; you sir were a lier then and i believe you not now ;